Cat On A Spreadsheet
Automated testing is often assumed to be incompatible with VBA. There is no built-in test runner, no assertion framework, and no official tooling comparable to what exists in mainstream development ecosystems. As a result, many Excel applications rely entirely on manual testing, tribal knowledge, and hope.
This perception is misleading. While VBA lacks first-class testing tools, it is entirely possible to design reliable, repeatable automated tests by treating VBA code as a system with boundaries, contracts, and observable outcomes. The key is architectural discipline rather than tooling abundance.
Most VBA code grows inside event handlers, button clicks, and worksheet modules. Logic is tightly coupled to Excel objects, user interface state, and mutable worksheets. In this environment, testing feels inseparable from opening files, clicking buttons, and visually inspecting results.
The solution is not to simulate the user interface. It is to move logic away from it.
Testability starts with separation of concerns. Business logic should live in standard modules or class modules that accept inputs and return outputs without touching the workbook directly. Excel objects should be treated as adapters, not decision-makers.
When logic is pure, it becomes testable.
This function can be tested without opening a worksheet, clicking a button, or relying on state.
Automated testing in VBA usually takes the form of a custom test runner. This is simply code that executes test cases, compares actual results to expected results, and records failures.
Each test is explicit, deterministic, and isolated.
Assertions are the backbone of automated tests. In VBA, assertions are usually implemented manually. A failing assertion should record context, not just stop execution.
When integrated with centralized error logging, a test failure becomes structured diagnostic data rather than a cryptic message box.
Logic that touches worksheets, ranges, or tables is inherently harder to test. The solution is indirection. Wrap Excel interactions behind small, replaceable functions or classes.
Instead of reading directly from a range, pass values in. Instead of writing directly to a worksheet, return results. This allows tests to supply known inputs and verify outputs without mutating real workbooks.
Some VBA procedures must interact with the file system, external applications, or the workbook itself. These can still be tested, but the test focuses on observable outcomes rather than internal mechanics.
Did a file get created? Did a worksheet appear? Did a value change as expected?
Before each test, create a controlled environment. After each test, clean it up. Determinism matters more than coverage.
Tests should never run against production data. A separate test workbook allows destructive operations, structural changes, and resets without risk.
Many teams embed tests in a dedicated add-in or developer-only workbook that references the production code. This mirrors real usage while preserving safety.
Tests do not need to be triggered manually. They can run automatically when a workbook opens in a development environment, when code is imported, or as part of a build pipeline that assembles the final Excel artifact.
The goal is not perfection, but early failure. A broken test should stop deployment before users ever see the file.
The most valuable effect of automated testing in VBA is not bug detection. It is architectural pressure. Code that is hard to test is usually hard to reason about, hard to maintain, and fragile under change. When code is designed to be testable, it becomes clearer, more modular, and more resilient by default.
Automated testing in VBA is not about mimicking modern frameworks. It is about applying modern discipline to a constrained environment — and doing so deliberately.
Cat On A Spreadsheet